Zur Kurzanzeige

Analyse der Operations-Verfahren bei Reablatio retinae ohne Proliferative Vitreoretinopathie nach primärer Buckelchirurgie - pars-plana-Vitrektomie versus Buckelrevision-

dc.contributor.advisorHoerauf, Hans Prof. Dr.
dc.contributor.authorSchwarz, Wiebke
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-13T15:19:04Z
dc.date.available2013-12-03T23:50:06Z
dc.date.issued2013-11-13
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-1735-0000-0001-BC48-C
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.53846/goediss-4156
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.53846/goediss-4156
dc.language.isodeude
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.subject.ddc610de
dc.titleAnalyse der Operations-Verfahren bei Reablatio retinae ohne Proliferative Vitreoretinopathie nach primärer Buckelchirurgie - pars-plana-Vitrektomie versus Buckelrevision-de
dc.typedoctoralThesisde
dc.title.translatedAnalysis of the different operative treatments of a retinal redetachment without PVR after primary buckle-surgery; pars-plana-vitrectomy versus buckle-surgeryde
dc.contributor.refereeRödel, Ralph Prof. Dr.
dc.date.examination2013-11-26
dc.description.abstractengWe retrospectively analyzed 79 eyes, which developed a rhegmathogenous retinal redetachment without PVR after primary buckle-surgery during the years 1994 – 2006, which were treated at the eye clinic of the University of Göttingen with a pars-plana-vitrectomy, a buckle-surgery or a combination of these two options. All treated eyes were divided into three groups dependent on the chosen type of operation (group I = pars-plana-vitrectomy, group II = buckle-surgery, group III = combination of the two options). The retina was reattached in 88, 1% of the cases (37/42), which were treated by a pars-plana-vitrectomy, in 89, 7% of the cases (26/29), which were treated by buckle surgery and in 100% of the cases (8/8), which were treated by a combination of the two operations. In all groups an improvement of the vision were achieved. Regarding the eyes with a preoperatively attached macular the groups showed no significant difference. In due consideration of the eyes with a detached macular, the improvement of the vision was significant higher in the vitrectomy-group. There was no significant difference in the development of operative complications. In the vitrectomy-group there was a significant higher rate of cataract-operations during the postoperative time compared to the buckle-group. Also the group which was treated with a combination of these two operations showed a higher cataract rate after surgery compared to the buckle-group. But the difference was not significant. There was a significant higher rate of a postoperative increased intraocular pressure in the pars-plana-vitrectomy-group and the combined-operation-group compared to the buckle-group. The change of refraction was significant higher in group II and III compared to group I.de
dc.contributor.coRefereeOppermann, Martin Prof. Dr.
dc.subject.engretinal redetachmentde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:7-11858/00-1735-0000-0001-BC48-C-2
dc.affiliation.instituteMedizinische Fakultätde
dc.subject.gokfullMedizin (PPN619874732)de
dc.subject.gokfullOphthalmologie (PPN619876239)de
dc.description.embargoed2013-12-03
dc.identifier.ppn771533624


Dateien

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige