Navigation ▼

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Baums, Mike Herbert PD Dr.
dc.contributor.author Fischer, Anna Kathrin
dc.date.accessioned 2013-12-03T10:05:21Z
dc.date.available 2013-12-10T23:50:05Z
dc.date.issued 2013-12-03
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-1735-0000-0022-5D2C-8
dc.language.iso deu de
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.subject.ddc 610 de
dc.title Vergleich den Sehnen-Knochen-Kontaktes von single- und double-row Technik mit unterschiedlichen Nahttechniken de
dc.title.alternative versus double-row suture anchor repair techniques de
dc.type doctoralThesis de
dc.title.translated Comparative evaluation of tendon-bone interface contact pressure in different single- de
dc.contributor.referee Baums, Mike Herbert PD Dr.
dc.date.examination 2013-12-03
dc.description.abstracteng The aim of the study was to evaluate the time zero contact pressure over a defined rotator cuff footprint using different repair and stitch techniques in an established sheep model. Forty fresh-frozen sheep shoulders were randomly assigned to five repair groups: single-row repair using simple stitches (SRA-s), single-row repair using horizontal mattress stitches (SRA-m), and single-row repair using arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches (SRA-ama). Double-row repair was either performed with a combination of simple and horizontal mattress stitches (DRA-sm) or with arthroscopic Mason-Allen/horizontal mattress stitches (DRA-amam). Investigations were performed using a pressure-sensitive film system. The average contact pressure and pressure pattern were measured for each group. Contact pressure was lowest in SRA-m followed by SRA-s. SRA-ama showed highest contact pressure of all single-row treatment groups (P < 0.05). DRA-amam presented the highest overall contact pressure (P < 0.05), whereas DRA-sm exerted contact pressure equal to that of SRA-ama. Both double-row techniques showed the most expanded pressure pattern. Average contact pressures for the more complex single- and double-row techniques utilizing arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches were greater than were those of the repair techniques utilizing simple and horizontal mattress stitches. However, the contact pattern between the anchors could be increased by using the double-row technique, resulting in more footprint coverage compared to patterns utilizing the single-row techniques. These results support the use of the more complex arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches and may improve the environment for healing of the repaired rotator cuff tendon. de
dc.contributor.coReferee Dumont, Clemens PD Dr.
dc.subject.ger double-row de
dc.subject.eng double-row de
dc.identifier.urn urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-11858/00-1735-0000-0022-5D2C-8-0
dc.affiliation.institute Medizinische Fakultät de
dc.subject.gokfull Medizin (PPN619874732) de
dc.subject.gokfull Orthopädie (PPN619876204) de
dc.description.embargoed 2013-12-10
dc.identifier.ppn 773355286

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record