Ethische Grundlagen und gesellschaftliche Perspektiven einer artgerechteren landwirtschaftlichen Nutztierhaltung

von Knoop, Kira

dc.contributor.advisor	Marggraf, Rainer Prof. Dr.
dc.contributor.author	von Knoop, Kira
dc.date.accessioned	2015-05-26T08:37:29Z
dc.date.available	2015-05-26T08:37:29Z
dc.date.issued	2015-05-26
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-1735-0000-0022-5FF6-0
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.53846/goediss-5090
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.53846/goediss-5090
dc.language.iso	deu	de
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.subject.ddc	630	de
dc.title	Ethische Grundlagen und gesellschaftliche Perspektiven einer artgerechteren landwirtschaftlichen Nutztierhaltung	de
dc.type	doctoralThesis	de
dc.title.translated	Ethical principles and social perspectives of welfare orientated animal husbandry	de
dc.contributor.referee	Strack, Micha PD Dr.
dc.date.examination	2014-02-12
dc.description.abstracteng	The animal agriculture and animal husbandry are the focus of public and political debate. The triggers are a number of food scandals like proven dioxin in eggs or unmarked horsemeat in products on the one hand and on the other hand dubious moral treatment of animals in livestock farming. In the first part of this study different animal ethical theories are explained and discussed. The aim is to find arguments to justify or refuse the use of animals for human purposes particularly in food production. From an ethical point of view the most problematic condition in animal husbandry is, that farm animals have to suffer in modern livestock farming systems. Based on this ethical discussion a quantitative study will be presented in the second part. The study deals with attitudes to livestock farming of students from different disciplines. The survey was taken in 2013. It tries to evaluate the personal acceptance and-perceived validity of preference and motivation tests to improve animal husbandry conditions in livestock farming. After the students had indicated their willingness to pay for eggs, milk and minced meat, they were asked how much more they would pay for these products from farms where the conditions were improved by preference and motivation tests. The disciplines organic agricultural sciences, biology, landscape ecology and philosophy are less satisfied with the current conditions of animal husbandry in conventional livestock farming than the disciplines agricultural sciences, business administration, economics and law. However, the acceptance and the validity of preference and motivation tests are equally positive in all examined fields of study. The willingness to pay for 1 liter milk was 0,99 €, for 6 eggs 1,93 € and 2,70 € for 250g minced meat. Various values were assumed behind the different acceptance of livestock farming. These values were tested with Schwartz’s Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ-21). The relationship between values and attitudes to livestock farming is discussed in the third article. Using the PVQ-21 the analyzed disciplines could be combined in three groups with similar values. The first group is formed by students of environmental sciences, landscape ecology, biology and philosophy. Students of these subjects entitle animals a higher consciousness and are more open to changes in livestock farming. In the second group there are agronomists, students of business administration, economics and law. These disciplines are significantly more tolerant with the current livestock conditions. The third group is the discipline psychology. It positions itself in the value circle between the first two groups	de
dc.contributor.coReferee	Steinfath, Holmer Prof. Dr.
dc.subject.ger	Tierhaltung	de
dc.subject.ger	Präferenztest	de
dc.subject.ger	Werte	de
dc.subject.ger	Tierethik	de
dc.subject.eng	animal husbandry	de
dc.subject.eng	animal ethics	de
dc.subject.eng	values	de
dc.subject.eng	preference test	de
dc.identifier.urn	urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-11858/00-1735-0000-0022-5FF6-0-3
dc.affiliation.institute	Fakultät für Agrarwissenschaften	de
dc.subject.gokfull	Land- und Forstwirtschaft (PPN621302791)	de
dc.identifier.ppn	826068251

Dateien

Name:Doktorarbeit Nebi.pdf

Größe:1.239Mb

Format:PDF

Öffnen

Name:: Doktorarbeit Nebi.pdf
Größe:: 1.239Mb
Format:: PDF

Öffnen

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Fakultät für Agrarwissenschaften (inkl. GAUSS) [873]

Zur Kurzanzeige