Bestimmung der zerebralen Atrophie bei neurologischen Erkrankungen des Marklagers mittels SIENA

Measurement of brain atrophy in neurological white matter diseases using the SIENA method

von Sara Marques Coelho Leiterholt
Dissertation
Datum der mündl. Prüfung:2016-11-14
Erschienen:2016-10-31
Betreuer:PD Dr. Gunther Helms
Gutachter:PD Dr. Katharina Hein
Gutachter:Prof. Dr. Rainer Mausberg
Zum Verlinken/Zitieren: http://dx.doi.org/10.53846/goediss-5907

 

 

Dateien

Name:Diss171016_onlinepublikation.pdf
Size:2.22Mb
Format:PDF

Lizenzbestimmungen:

Zusammenfassung

Englisch

Magnetic resonance imaging is an important method to diagnose and evaluate the progression of MS. SIENA is a program package for the analysis of brain volume change, especially atrophy. In the present study we used the SIENA method to longitudinally evaluate the brain volume change in MS patients. MRI scans were performed every six months over two years in a study population of 34 MS patients and 12 normal subjects. The MS group consisted of 20 patients with RRMS, 11 with SPMS and 3 patients without specification of the phenotype. We found that all groups showed standard deviations that were large compared to the mean changes. Thus, there was no statistically significant brain atrophy in the MS groups. To explain these results by specific features of SIENA, we performed further analysis of serial MRI scans in controlled cases. In one patient with Marburg’s variant of MS errors were due to inaccuracy in tissue segmentation. The brain growth of an infant paediatric patient could only be shown after correcting the initial SIENA results with volume scaling. After applying this scaling correction to the study cohorts, however, the results showed an even larger standard deviation. In the analysis of consecutive MRI scans of the MS group we found that individual outliers in the series were responsible for the large spreading of the results. The validity of the SIENA method was demonstrated by the authors Smith et al. using a transitivity analysis. Our analysis shows that this approach to validation reduces the impact of individual outliers. Despite the inaccuracy observed in our study group, we were able to reproduce the transitivity results. A larger data collection period with additional MRI scans and thus the possibility to identify and eliminate outliers would be needed to evaluate the brain volume change with the SIENA method in MS patients.
Keywords: multiple sclerosis; brain atrophy; SIENA
Schlagwörter: Multiple Sclerose; Gehirnatrophie; SIENA
 
Statistik