Zur Kurzanzeige

Audiometrische Ergebnisse und Patientenzufriedenheit mit der Vibrant Soundbridge im Vergleich zur Bonebridge bei Patienten mit kombinierter Schallleitungs- und Schallempfindungsschwerhörigkeit

dc.contributor.advisorCanis, Martin Prof. Dr.
dc.contributor.authorVolbers, Laura
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-13T09:22:08Z
dc.date.available2017-02-20T23:50:34Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-13
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-1735-0000-002B-7D3B-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.53846/goediss-6095
dc.language.isodeude
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610de
dc.titleAudiometrische Ergebnisse und Patientenzufriedenheit mit der Vibrant Soundbridge im Vergleich zur Bonebridge bei Patienten mit kombinierter Schallleitungs- und Schallempfindungsschwerhörigkeitde
dc.typedoctoralThesisde
dc.title.translatedFunctional results and satisfaction of patients with the Vibrant Soundbridge compared to the Bonebridge for patients with mixed hearing lossde
dc.contributor.refereeSchittkowski, Michael Prof. Dr
dc.date.examination2017-02-13
dc.description.abstractengThe objectives of the study were to review and evaluate functional results and satisfaction of patients with the active middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge and compare these results with a new active bone conduction implant Bonebridge. A retrospective chart review of 13 patients (13 ears) after implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge and 11 patients (12 ears) after implantation of the Bonebridge in one tertiary referral center between Septemper 2008 and March 2014 was performed. All patients suffered from mixed hearing loss. Outcome measures were pure-tone audiometry (air conduction and bone conduction thresholds, air-bone gap and functional gain), speech audiometry (Freiburg Monosyllabic Test in quiet and in noise, Oldenburger Sentence Test) and a patient satisfaction questionnaire (Glasgow Benefit Inventory). Average functional gain was 33,2 ± 12,3 dB and 26,4 ± 9,4 dB, monosyllable recognition improved from 25,4 ± 25,1 % (unaided) to 82,7 ± 15,0 % (aided) and 14,2 ± 16,4 % to 84,2 ± 13,0 %, mean speech reception thresholds (SRTs, 50%-correct level) of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA) improved significantly from -0,1 ± 4,1 dB SNR to -2,7 ± 2,9 dB SNR and from 2,3 ± 3,3 dB to -1,4 ± 3,4 dB SNR after implantation, Glasgow Benefit Inventory total score was 34,9 ± 12,2 and 32,8 ± 14,5 in patients with Vibrant Soundbridge and Bonebridge, respectively. In two patient collectives matched for degree of mixed hearing loss, the Bonebridge shows comparable and satisfying results to the Vibrant Soundbridge in pure-tone and speech audiometry. Patient satisfaction with both devices was high and comparable.de
dc.contributor.coRefereeMausberg, Rainer Prof. Dr.
dc.subject.engVibrant Soundbridgede
dc.subject.engBonebridgede
dc.subject.engmixed hearing lossde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:7-11858/00-1735-0000-002B-7D3B-8-5
dc.affiliation.instituteMedizinische Fakultätde
dc.subject.gokfullHuman- und Zahnmedizinde
dc.description.embargoed2017-02-20
dc.identifier.ppn880001933


Dateien

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige