Audiometrische Ergebnisse und Lebensqualität mit einem aktiven Mittelohrimplantat bei reiner Innenohrschwerhörigkeit im Vergleich zu Patienten mit konventionellen Hörgeräten

Bewarder, Julian

dc.contributor.advisor	Canis, Martin Prof. Dr.
dc.contributor.author	Bewarder, Julian
dc.date.accessioned	2016-02-25T10:18:43Z
dc.date.available	2016-03-24T23:50:05Z
dc.date.issued	2016-02-25
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-1735-0000-0028-86D9-3
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.53846/goediss-5532
dc.language.iso	deu	de
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc	610	de
dc.title	Audiometrische Ergebnisse und Lebensqualität mit einem aktiven Mittelohrimplantat bei reiner Innenohrschwerhörigkeit im Vergleich zu Patienten mit konventionellen Hörgeräten	de
dc.type	doctoralThesis	de
dc.title.translated	Long-term functional outcome and satisfaction of patients with an active middle ear implant for sensorineural hearing loss compared to a matched population with conventional hearing aids	de
dc.contributor.referee	Schittkowski, Michael Prof. Dr.
dc.date.examination	2016-03-17
dc.description.abstracteng	The objectives of the study were to review the results of an active middle ear implant for sensorineural hearing loss in patients who were unable to wear or did not benefit from conventional hearing aids in comparison to patients with a matched degree of hearing loss successfully fitted with a conventional hearing aid. A retrospective chart review of 10 patients (10 ears) after implantation of an active middle ear implant and 12 patients (13 ears) with conventional hearing aids in one tertiary referral center was performed. Intervention for sensorineural hearing loss was the implantation of an active middle ear implant in one group or fitting of conventional hearing aids in the other group. Outcome measures were pure-tone audiometry (auditory thresholds, functional gain), speech audiometry (Freiburg Monosyllabic Test in quiet and in noise) and a quality-of-life questionnaire (Glasgow Benefit Inventory). Average functional gain was 25.2 ± 8.6 and 14.6 ± 10.8 dB, speech recognition score in noise was 36.6 ± 18.4 and 31.2 ± 19.2 % and in quiet was 66.0 ± 23.2 and 61.5 ± 23.8 %, Glasgow Benefit Inventory total score was 38.3 ± 32.3 and 24.8 ± 22.2 in patients with active middle ear implants and conventional hearing aids, respectively. In two patient groups matched for degree of sensorineural hearing loss, active middle ear implants provided comparable speech recognition and superior functional gain and quality of life compared to conventional hearing aids.	de
dc.contributor.coReferee	Oppermann, Martin Prof. Dr.
dc.subject.ger	Kombinierte Schwerhörigkeit	de
dc.subject.ger	Mittelohrimplantat	de
dc.subject.eng	vibrant soundbridge	de
dc.subject.eng	sensorineural hearing loss	de
dc.identifier.urn	urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-11858/00-1735-0000-0028-86D9-3-2
dc.affiliation.institute	Medizinische Fakultät	de
dc.subject.gokfull	Medizin (PPN619874732)	de
dc.subject.gokfull	Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie (PPN619876220)	de
dc.description.embargoed	2016-03-24
dc.identifier.ppn	848507576

Dateien

Name:Dissertation Julian Bewarder.pdf

Größe:1.622Mb

Format:PDF

Öffnen

Name:: Dissertation Julian Bewarder.pdf
Größe:: 1.622Mb
Format:: PDF

Öffnen

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Human- und Zahnmedizin [2877]

Zur Kurzanzeige