Zur Kurzanzeige

In-vivo-Biofilmakkumulation auf implantatprothetischen Werkstoffen

dc.contributor.advisorBürgers, Ralf Prof. Dr.
dc.contributor.authorWiessner, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-12T08:26:59Z
dc.date.available2021-07-21T00:50:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/21.11130/00-1735-0000-0008-58A1-F
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.53846/goediss-8728
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.53846/goediss-8728
dc.language.isodeude
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610de
dc.titleIn-vivo-Biofilmakkumulation auf implantatprothetischen Werkstoffende
dc.typedoctoralThesisde
dc.title.translatedIn vivo biofilm accumulation on implant abutment materialsde
dc.contributor.refereeRödig, Tina Prof. Dr.
dc.date.examination2021-07-14
dc.description.abstractengAIM. The aim of this in vivo study was to investigate the biofilm formation on the surface of four different implant abutment materials (titanium, zirconia, PEEK, BioHPP). MATERIAL/METHODS. Split specimens were developed and mounted in individual removable acrylic upper jaw splints (4 specimens in every splint) and worn by 20 healthy volunteers for 24 h. All specimens were polished and half of them were then artificially aged. The surface roughness was determined using widefield confocal microscopy. Biofilm accumulation was analyzed by using fluorescence staining and microscopy. RESULTS. The surface roughness showed no significant difference between the materials. Zirconia conducted the lowest biofilm mass followed by titanium. BioHPP showed the highest biofilm mass. There were significant differences in microbial colonization between the individual materials except for BioHPP and regular PEEK. Specimes located in the posterior region of the splints showed a significant higher biofilm aggregation than those positioned in the anterior region. CONCLUSION.The significant differences in initial microbial adhesion between all materials apart from PEEK and BioHPP within 24 hours indicated that the careful choice of the abutment material can influence the tendency of biofilm accumulation and therefore reduce the risk of developing a periimplantitis and consequently a possible implant loss.de
dc.contributor.coRefereeSchön, Margarete Prof. Dr.
dc.subject.gerImplantat Abutmentde
dc.subject.gerBiofilmde
dc.subject.gerPlaqueakkumulationde
dc.subject.gerRauheitde
dc.subject.gerFluoreszenzmikroskopiede
dc.subject.engimplant abutments; biofilm accumulation; bacterial adhesion; surface roughness; fluorescence microscopyde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:7-21.11130/00-1735-0000-0008-58A1-F-7
dc.affiliation.instituteMedizinische Fakultätde
dc.subject.gokfullZahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde - Allgemein- und Gesamtdarstellungen (PPN619876360)de
dc.description.embargoed2021-07-21
dc.identifier.ppn1762719959


Dateien

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige